Gracias por el #FF ;) sciencegoddess http://t.co/ZqJSpFcT ~ docuguy

Discovering Sarah Palin

500 Words on Thursday | Written by Lee Schneider

This week, I discovered Sarah Palin in a strange place. She showed up as the star of a planned new reality show on The Learning Channel, a unit of Discovery Communications. The show is called “Sarah Palin’s Alaska.”

It’s surprising that Discovery Communications, parent company of such cable television channels as Animal Planet, The Discovery Channel and TLC — and known for their stunning wildlife-focused shows — would chose to embrace such a controversial and anti-wildlife persona as Sarah Palin.”
-Rodger Schlickeisen, President, Defenders of Wildlife

That sound you hear? That would be the huge vacuum forming between Discovery and its viewers. Discovery seems to care about nature and Sarah Palin wants to drill oil everywhere and kill all animals. Exaggeration?

As Jimmy Kimmel put it, “Her baby seal risotto is really fantastic.”

She’ll be able to buy lots of baby seal steaks with the reported $1 million per episode paycheck she’ll receive. Discovery wants to put a lot of money in Palin’s pocket.

Ok, I’m going to put a little Valium in my herbal tea, try to keep the politics out of this and just look at the message Discovery is sending.

Your brand is what you stand for. What does Discovery stand for? Ratings? Even though Sarah Palin is popular with nutcases, are there really enough nutcases to merit putting her on Discovery for the ratings? I thought CNN was the only really desperate network. (Still working to keep the politics out of this, sorry.)

According to Defenders of Wildlife, Sarah Palin fought against protections for whales and polar bears. She continues to support hunters who fly in small planes to gun down wolves from the air. I wish I was present at the network meeting when somebody said, “Sarah Palin is the perfect person to tell me about animals.” As in we want unstable, trigger-happy Glenn Beck to talk to us about terrorism.

Putting a controversial person on TV is an old game. It comes about when smart programming executives sit in a conference room, drink vodka straight from the bottle and say “let’s make some noise and hope somebody pays attention.”

We expect brands to be true to themselves. From Fox we expect overheated pseudo-patriotic gumbo. From the broadcast networks we expect some Bachelors and Survivors and other diversions. Television is a numbers game steered by advertisers. Ratings – good. Breaking your brand – bad.

Breaking the brand would never happen to good old psychotic uncle Fox. Fox is never going to break its brand because we don’t expect Fox to stand for anything, except maybe scaring people. They don’t worry about facts or truth over at Fox. They just need to find the next big mouth. They just need to make some noise.

Different deal with Discovery. Discovery stands for something: Curiosity, knowledge, exploration and compassion. Go ahead, Discovery, make noise but also examine your motives. You have to, because you stand for something. We want to depend on you for that.

You can sign the Defenders of Wildlife petition against Sarah Palin’s show by clicking here.

Photo credit: auburnxc via Flickr and creative commons.


We Go Live in the Courtroom

We must bump the blog this week for a live special report. We take you to pre-trial motions at Media District Court, the Hon. Judge Alan Smithee presiding. Transcription by Lee Schneider.

photo credit: Valerie Everett via Flickr

Bailiff: Case number 1000256, the People of the World vs. Television.

Attorney for the People: Your honor, I represent the People in this action, but I find web media more useful than television and because of that bias I would like to excuse myself from the case.

Judge: That’s ok. I’m down with bias. Proceed.

Attorney for the People: Well, all right. Let’s start with a website called 8 Billion Lives. It’s an online platform for films that focus on the world’s non-famous population. I ask your honor to rule on who is more worthwhile: Sharon Osbourne on Celebrity Apprentice or a video about an 82-year-old Japanese guy in a t-shirt talking about gratitude.

Judge: Sharon Osbourne is annoying. I rule for the guy in the t-shirt.

Attorney for Television: (jumping to his feet) Your honor, we introduce Gov. Rob Blagojevich on Celebrity Apprentice.

Judge: Irrelevant. And immoral.

Attorney for Television: We would like to introduce Ellen Degeneres as a witness.

The People: Relevance? On her show she danced for 49 minutes and talked about her chair for 11 minutes. How is that deepening our understanding of ourselves?

Attorney for Television: Objection! Ellen is on American Idol now, a meaningless show that is nevertheless universally beloved. She is important to everyone who cares about nothing.

Judge: I will allow Ellen’s testimony into evidence, even if her comedy sucks.

The People: We introduce a movie called Skiing Everest. It’s an independent film and will have to work hard to find an audience amid the media clutter. The makers will need to promote it with blogs, Facebook and Twitter.

Judge: I’ll allow it.

Attorney for Television: But — but — your honor, we have strayed from the mainstream! The point of mass media is that everybody has to like it all the time. The short films on 8 Billion Lives, for example, are boring and experimental.

The People: Your honor, if you’re doing a website about eight billion different lives by its very nature it has to have something for everyone. The technical expertise of the film is not as important as the material. I cite the lower cost of production that allows more voices, and simplified approaches to storytelling that make for good journalism, such as the audio slideshows cited by the Neiman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard. Or the wisdom-of-the-everyman you get from videos on KamaTube and go inspire go. Or the reporting you find on the SHELTER blog.

Attorney for Television: Objection! The SHELTER blog is edited by the owner of this blog.

Judge: Sustained. Let’s move on, please.

Attorney for Television: Can’t we at least introduce Glenn Beck into evidence?

Judge: Only if he’s in a caged death match with Naomi Campbell. (Raps gavel.) Court is adjourned until the next blog.